- Vulnerable U
- Posts
- Cartel Hacker Turned an FBI Agent’s Phone into a Hit List
Cartel Hacker Turned an FBI Agent’s Phone into a Hit List
How a single phone number, leaky telecom data, and a city-wide camera grid helped the Sinaloa cartel hunt, and reportedly kill, U.S. informants.
TL;DR
An internal Department of Justice Inspector-General audit, published 26 June 2025, reveals that in 2018 a hacker on the Sinaloa cartel’s payroll spied on an FBI assistant legal attaché posted at the U.S. embassy in Mexico City. By quietly harvesting the agent’s call-detail records (CDRs) and geolocation pings, then cross-referencing them with live feeds from Mexico City’s vast C5 camera network, the cartel identified, tailed, and “in some cases” killed cooperating witnesses and potential sources.
The Breach
Late in 2018, while an FBI assistant legal attaché (ALAT) hustled between back-channel meetings in Mexico City, a cartel-hired hacker was sitting on the agent’s call-detail records (CDRs) and tower pings. Armed with nothing more than the agent’s mobile number, the hacker quietly pulled incoming and outgoing calls, live geolocation, and then overlaid the dots onto Mexico City’s C5 camera network, a grid of more than 64,000 public-safety cameras that blanket the capital.
When the agent met with would-be informants, cartel spotters already knew who, when, and where. According to the newly released U.S. Department of Justice Inspector-General (DOJ OIG) audit, some of those sources were intimidated or killed.
The revelation appears in the OIG’s 47-page report Audit of the FBI’s Efforts to Mitigate the Effects of Ubiquitous Technical Surveillance (UTS), published 26 June 2025 (Report No. 25-065). The document reviews how proliferating data brokers, commercial tracking feeds, and citywide sensor meshes have leveled the playing field for criminals and smaller nation-states alike. Sometimes at a tragic cost. (oig.justice.gov)
How the cartel’s tradecraft worked
1. Obtaining network-side data
The audit does not detail the exact technique, but investigators concluded the hacker used the ALAT’s phone number alone to pull CDRs and location. That strongly suggests an SS7 or Diameter lookup. The same decades-old telecom signaling protocols whose flaws have fueled a gray market for location data since at least 2015. A single insider with carrier-core access, or a criminal broker on Telegram, can buy one-off “ping” services for a few hundred dollars. (reuters.com)
2. Fusing with Mexico City’s C5 cameras
Mexico City operates Latin America’s largest municipal CCTV system, with over 64,000 IP cameras currently in use, and an announced goal of 80,000 by year-end. A cartel asset inside the C5 operations center (or with API credentials) could match tower-level coordinates to street-level video in seconds. (biometricupdate.com)
3. Building the pattern of life
By replaying the ALAT’s daily movements against the camera grid, the hacker mapped meeting spots and contact faces. Cartel surveillance teams then shadowed, threatened, or eliminated people who appeared too close to U.S. law enforcement. The FBI would not confirm the body count, but the OIG calls the outcome “loss of life” and “severe operational compromise.” (nypost.com)
The OIG’s verdict on the FBI
The audit is unsparing:
No bureau-wide threat model for UTS. Field offices handle sensor-rich environments on an ad-hoc basis.
Training blind spots. Agents receive classic countersurveillance lessons, but little on SS7 exploitation or data-broker economics.
Slow mitigation loop. A 2017 pilot program to harden mobile operations still lacks mandatory adoption eight years later.
The FBI accepted all four OIG recommendations, including a formal strategy, accelerated tech deployments, and recurring red-team audits against its own tradecraft.
Technical questions the report leaves open
Unanswered | Why it matters |
---|---|
Exact telco vector - SS7 lookup, SIM-swap, or insider portal abuse? | Determines whether better carrier contracts or device defenses would have blocked the breach. |
Camera-system access - API key, live operator feed, or post-incident playback? | Gauges insider risk vs. pure cyber intrusion. |
Duration of compromise - days, months, or years? | Impacts how many human sources were exposed and whether other U.S. agencies were also tracked. |
Lessons for counter-intel and corporate security teams
Treat phone numbers as credentials. Rotate mission phones like VPN exit nodes; never re-use numbers across operations.
Layer carrier obfuscation. Virtual IMSIs, anonymized eSIM bundles, and MVNO “buffer lines” raise the cost of real-time CDR pulls.
Monitor dark-market ping services. Threat-intel groups already track SS7 brokers; feed those indicators into travel-risk briefings.
Assume parallel compromise. If a single phone is tracked, every physical meet it attends is also burned; adjust HUMINT logistics accordingly.
The bigger picture: UTS everywhere
From London’s Ring-doorbell saturation to Shenzhen’s face-rec systems, camera count is doubling every 18 months. Add location-selling SDKs and data-broker APIs, and you have what the OIG calls “an ecosystem that allows actors with modest budgets to achieve strategic effects.”
In other words, the Sinaloa cartel incident is not an outlier, but more of a preview. Whether you’re an undercover cop, a corporate threat-hunter, or a journalist protecting sources, the line between “low-grade OSINT” and “full-spectrum targeting” has vanished.
The cartel’s hacker didn’t break Signal, implant spyware, or pop a baseband zero-day. He weaponized the infrastructure we all use and governments fund. Until defenders, law enforcement, and corporations alike treat metadata as sensitive as message content, the next breach won’t require a cartel war chest. It will take a credit card, an API token, and a city with too many cameras.